BIP Columbus

collapse
Home / Daily News Analysis / If Google can’t make AI agents useful, maybe no one can

If Google can’t make AI agents useful, maybe no one can

May 21, 2026  Twila Rosenbaum  14 views
If Google can’t make AI agents useful, maybe no one can

For years, tech companies have promised that artificial intelligence would give everyone a capable personal assistant—yet what they delivered often resembled a clueless intern more than a helpful aide. Over the past six months, that narrative has started to shift, thanks largely to OpenClaw, an open-source AI agent platform that went viral. Now, at its I/O 2026 developer conference, Google has unveiled its most ambitious agentic AI push yet. The company is betting that its vast ecosystem of services—Gmail, Drive, Docs, Photos, Search, and more—gives it a decisive advantage in making agents practical, reliable, and widely adopted.

Google’s announcements include Gemini Spark, a consumer-focused agent that can run 24/7 in the cloud, syncing across devices and performing tasks like shopping, research, and scheduling. The company also introduced new “information agents” for Search that perform continuous background research, plus an expansion of its Antigravity agent development platform. Underpinning all of this is the Gemini 3.5 model series, promising faster performance and lower costs. But can Google succeed where so many others have stumbled?

The Rise of OpenClaw and Its Impact on the AI Industry

OpenClaw, launched in November 2025, quickly gained millions of users by letting people interact with AI agents through everyday apps like WhatsApp and Telegram. Users could set agents to run around the clock as long as a laptop stayed open, handling basic tasks reliably despite clear flaws. Its simplicity and utility forced every major AI lab to take notice. In February 2026, OpenAI acquired OpenClaw—though it remains open source—and hired its creator, Peter Steinberger. The acquisition signaled that even the leading AI companies recognized the platform had cracked a crucial usability barrier.

For Google, OpenClaw’s success highlighted both an opportunity and a challenge. The company has been working on agentic AI for years, with earlier experiments like Project Mariner and the background agents in Gemini 3. Those efforts, however, were often slow, clunky, or prone to failure. Google’s deepest asset—its integration with users’ daily digital lives—remained largely untapped. OpenClaw proved that agents could be useful if they were always-on, accessible via messaging, and connected to real-world tools. Google now aims to do even better by embedding agents directly into its own suite of services.

Gemini Spark: Google’s Consumer Agent bet

At I/O 2026, Google unveiled Gemini Spark, its new AI agent for consumers. Unlike earlier agent experiments that required a laptop to stay open and a browser to be hijacked, Gemini Spark is cloud-based. It can run 24/7 without any device left on, syncing across the web, Android, and iOS. Users can text or email their agents directly, a feature that mirrors OpenClaw’s conversational interface. The agent is designed to perform tasks across Google’s own services—Gmail, Calendar, Docs, Photos, and Maps—as well as more than 30 external partners including Dropbox, Uber, and Spotify.

Google executives described typical use cases: shopping, researching, coordinating schedules, and planning events. Josh Woodward, the Gemini app lead, said he used Gemini Spark to plan a neighborhood block party; the agent tracked RSVPs, sent reminders, and checked homeowners’ association rules about inflatable decorations. Gemini Spark will roll out to trusted testers this week, with a beta for US users on Google’s Ultra plan next month. If it works as advertised, it could represent a major step forward, moving agents from novelty to everyday utility.

The Antigravity Platform and Developer Tools

Beyond consumer agents, Google announced a significant expansion of Antigravity, the agentic development platform introduced roughly six months earlier. A new standalone Antigravity desktop app will serve as a central hub for building and managing autonomous agents. The platform now includes tools for non-programmers, similar to recent offerings from OpenAI and Anthropic that broaden coding services to more approachable interfaces. This move aims to democratize agent creation, allowing businesses and hobbyists to tailor agents for specific tasks without deep technical expertise.

Antigravity’s expansion comes amid a broader industry trend. OpenAI’s Codex and Anthropic’s Claude have both extended their coding tools to support agent workflows. Google, however, hopes its integration with the Gemini 3.5 model series will give it a competitive edge. The new models are designed to be especially good at deploying multiple agents simultaneously and handling long-running tasks—critical for the always-on agent vision. Gemini 3.5 Flash, the first entry in the series, promises to be four times faster than other frontier models and significantly cheaper, a crucial factor given the high token costs of persistent agents.

Search Agents and Background Research

Google also introduced “information agents” for Search, a long-awaited upgrade that aims to make generative AI more than just a gimmick. These agents can perform continuous background research—tracking stock market changes, monitoring weather patterns for the best picnic day, or following breaking news. They represent Google’s attempt to move beyond the pitfalls of earlier AI overviews, which sometimes recommended pizza with glue. By running in the background and updating results in real time, these agents could make Search more proactive and context-aware.

The timing of these updates is strategic. Google faces increasing pressure from competitors: OpenAI’s ChatGPT Pulse offers a morning briefing; Anthropic’s Claude excels at coding; and Microsoft’s Copilot integrates with the Office suite. Google’s advantage is scale—its apps now serve more than 900 million users monthly across 230 countries and 70 languages. The company can also subsidize costs to attract users, a luxury startups lack. But historically, Google’s agent experiments have been slow to reach consumers, and the company has a reputation for launching products that fizzle. The question is whether this time will be different.

Behind the Technology: Gemini 3.5 and Cost Efficiency

Koray Kavukcuoglu, CTO of Google DeepMind, emphasized that the new models are built specifically for agentic workloads. Gemini 3.5 Flash, available next month, is supposed to deliver significantly better coding capabilities than its predecessor, Gemini 3. According to Kavukcuoglu, it excels when deploying multiple agents simultaneously and completing long-running tasks—a direct response to OpenClaw’s continuous operation model. The model is also four times faster and less than half the price of comparable frontier models, in some cases one third the cost. For 24/7 AI agents, token costs add up quickly, so affordability is a critical design goal.

Google’s approach mirrors the lessons learned from OpenClaw: agents need to be always-on, context-aware, and integrated into existing workflows. But Google can go further by embedding agents directly into the services users already rely on. The Daily Brief, a morning update similar to ChatGPT Pulse, is another example of how Google is borrowing successful features while adding its own spin. All these pieces—Spark, Search agents, Antigravity, and Gemini 3.5—form a cohesive strategy to finally make AI agents useful at scale.

Still, challenges remain. Privacy concerns are heightened when agents have access to email, calendar, and location data. Google has promised that Gemini Spark and other tools will comply with its existing privacy policies, but users may be wary. Additionally, the reliability of agents in complex, multi-step tasks is unproven. Google’s own history includes high-profile AI failures, from biased search results to embarrassing chatbot errors. If Gemini Spark can’t avoid similar pitfalls, it could set back the entire agent category.

Moreover, OpenClaw’s open-source nature continues to be a wildcard. The platform is now owned by OpenAI, but it remains freely available, meaning developers can still build their own agents without Google’s ecosystem. Smaller startups may create specialized agents that outperform Google’s general-purpose tools. And while Google has deep pockets, its bureaucracy could slow down innovation. The company has historically struggled to move quickly in the fast-paced AI market, often playing catch-up to nimbler rivals.

Despite these hurdles, Google’s I/O 2026 announcements represent its most serious attempt yet to make AI agents a reality. The combination of a massive user base, a rich ecosystem of services, and a new cost-efficient model gives it a unique position. If any company can turn AI agents from a hyped concept into a daily utility, it’s Google. But the industry has seen many false dawns. The next few months will reveal whether the promise of agentic AI can finally be fulfilled—or whether even the tech giant with the most to lose will fall short.


Source: The Verge News


Share:

Your experience on this site will be improved by allowing cookies Cookie Policy